Brent, to be more precise, I was thinking that every photon event staring from 1 nanosecond ago, on backwards, might still be floating around somewhere. I am wondering also if this data is accessible, in princple? Yes, the bright stuff from some quasar 5 billion years ago, but maybe also a bird chirping on a branch from 1811, by a stream near Bangalore. Less luminescence, yet still photonically interactive. This may be a conceptual dead end in physics and astronomy and perhaps mathematics.
-----Original Message----- From: Brent Meeker <[email protected]> To: everything-list <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Apr 19, 2016 12:58 am Subject: Re: Non-locality and MWI ?? Every time you perceive something visually you've mined data from your light cone. Brent On 4/18/2016 8:29 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote: > This is a foolish, but related question. It is, is there a means, in > princple, to somehow data mine the minkowski light cone? Conceptually, > its photons interacting with baryons of one sort or another, so ought > now the photon patterns of interactions with the old Bohr model of > particles? Its a question that I ponder every once in a while. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
