Saibal Mitra: > And this is the core of the disagreement, you say that the results are > already there, but in the MWI this is false. In the MWI the cat is not > either dead or alive before you open the box, the superposition has > become entangled with the environment, but both branches are relevant > until you get to know the result.
It seems (to me) interesting this quote from Nicolas Gisin "Against Many- Worlds", ch. 4 of the paper ' Are There Quantum Effects Coming from Outside Space-time? Nonlocality, free will and "no many-worlds" ' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1011.3440.pdf "On the contrary, I do not see any explanatory power in the many worlds: it seems to be made just to prevent one from asking (possibly provocative) questions. Moreover, it has built in it the impossibility of any test: all its predictions are identical to those of quantum theory. For me, it looks like "cushion for laziness" (un coussin de paresse in French). And there is a second, decisive, reason to reject the many-worlds view: it leaves no space for free will." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
