On 29 Apr 2016, at 04:16, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 29 April 2016 at 07:27, spudboy100 via Everything List <[email protected]
> wrote:
Hah! Well somebody will get rich of we take the Everett stuff as
fact. Not likely myself for all this.
Sincerely,
Your humble clone
Kill off the poor ones and then you're sure to be the rich one.
That seems to me like cutting of the right part of a wooden rule to
get only a left part.
Spudboy, MWI is only an attempt to make sense of QM. Its practical
application is the same as QM. Now David Deustch would mention Quantum
computer, that he discovered thanks to the MWI.
MWI = taken the reality of the superposed states seriously, as already
the two slits experiment with one photon illustrates that we should do.
For me, but also for Deutsch and for Everett MWI = QM-without
collapse. Everett's published paper, even its long text, does not
mention "many world" but only a new theory: the old one minus the
physical collapse of the wave.
Bruno
--
Stathis Papaioannou
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
