BruceK and Smitra,my apologies for being obsolete and uninformed, I learned math & phsx in the very early 40s (19- that is) and did not need to refresh in my 1/2 c. of a successful R&D activity in specialty polymers. Since then (1987), however, I became an agnostic. What reverberates now is that Everett called MWI a bunch of IDENTICAL universes. In my agnostic view "MY" MWI consists of possibly no two identical universes, ours being one pretty simpleminded system - we know it only from the inside. We have no access to the others. John Mikes Ph.D. (chem-phys-math 1948) ----------------------------- 'The ‘many world interpretation seems to me an extravagant, andabove all an extravagantly vague, hypothesis. I could almostdismiss it as silly. And yet... It may have something distinctiveto say in connection to ‘Einstein Podolsky Rosen puzzle’, and itwould be worthwhile, I think, to formulate some precise versionof it to see if it really so. And the existence of all possibleworlds may make us more comfortable about existence of ourown world... which seems to be in some ways a highly improbableone." (John Bell, 1986)
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
