On 01 Jul 2016, at 00:41, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/07/2016 3:05 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
It is not a coincidence that those who have a difficulty with
computationalism, have a difficulty with Everett, and hallucinate
spooky action at a distance.
Everett, despite your repeated claims, did not eliminate non-
locality from quantum mechanics. It is pure rhetoric to continually
refer to non-locality as "spooky action at a distance". You should
get up to speed with contemporary thinking about non-locality in
physics.
(And before you start shouting "ad hominem", reflect on your oft
repeated assertions that some of us should get up to speed on
contemporary logic/computer science.)
Yes, eventually, I saw we were on the same side on this. Everett
eliminated only the spooky actions at a distance, which result from
Bell's inequality violation once we assume the uniqueness of
measurement outcome. The non locality which remains is the trivial
one, which exists already in any theory, as most attributes of a
theory are non local (if the number one disappear, all numbers
disappear non locally, but of course without any physical (nor mental)
action at a distance).
Bruno
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
