On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Adrian Chira <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> free will makes no sense in any context > > > > Except the context which assumes free will. If the assumption of free will > leads to a logical contradiction please point that out. > I can't point out the contradiction because there is none. And it leads to no contradiction because free will can't be assumed. And free will can't be assumed because there is nothing there to assume. In other words "free will" is gibberish. Assuming there is a largest prime number leads to a logical contradiction, but assuming free will exists is like assuming Klogknee exists. > > > an implicit and, as of yet, unsupported assumption that you make is that > anything that doesn't make sense is worthless. > > Good heavens! I really didn't think a assumption that gibberish is worthless was controversial! > > > It would be great if you could share why you think that's the case. > > Ok this is my response as to why I think that is the case: "Phlobneegob". Do you think my response has worth or is it worthless? John K Clark > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
