On Saturday, November 25, 2017 at 3:39:00 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:08 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
> *​>​>>​ ​Do you really think that when you pull a slot machine and get 
>>>> some outcome, the 10 million other possible outcomes occur in 10 million 
>>>> other universe? *
>>>>
>>>
>>> ​>> ​
>>> ​I could be wrong but that would be my best guess.​
>>>
>>
>> ​> ​
>> Is the slot machine duplicated in those 10 million new universes?
>>
>
> ​
> If the Schrodinger
> ​ ​
> Wave Equation really means what it says then the answer can only be yes.
>

Since your conclusions seem immensely more bizarre than collapse of the wf, 
your interpretation of what the SE means must be in error. AG
 

>   The
> ​ ​
> Copenhagen
> ​ ​
> people felt that was 
> ​just ​
> too strange so they stuck stuff into their theory that the mathematics 
> alone didn't say, as a result they got rid of one form of weirdness, the 
> multiverse, but inadvertently created two new forms of weirdness: the 
> future can effect the past and things only exist when you look at them. 
> There is just no way to stamp out the weird from the quantum world and be 
> consistent with experiment.   
>
>
> ​> ​
>> And the gambler cranking it? And the casino? And the city where the 
>> casino is resident? And Andromeda, and beyond, up to and including the BB?
>>
>
> ​Yes, and that raises ​another question, how can the MWI produce finite 
> probabilities if infinite numbers are involved? To make matters even worse 
> the infinite numbers involved are not even countable. The answer is not all 
> those universes change the probability.
>
> If I paint a number of disks on a wall of various diameters then put a 
> blindfold on and throw darts at the wall there are a uncountably
> ​ ​
> infinite number of points that dart could hit, but my eye is not perfect 
> so there are only a finite number spots on that wall that I can consciously 
> distinguish
> ​,​
> and there are more of those spots in the large disks than the small ones 
> so there are more distinguishable versions of me seeing the dart hit the 
> larger disk than the smaller.
>
> To get back to the slot machine,
> ​ ​
> if
> ​ the​ 
> Schrodinger
> ​ Wave is correct ​
> there are more than 10 million versions of me looking at that slot 
> machine, infinitely more in fact, but the version of me where a pebble on a 
> planet in the Andromeda Galaxy is a quarter inch to the left is not 
> consciously discernible by me from a universe where the pebble is a quarter 
> inch to the right, and so when I consciously calculate probabilities the 
> two 
> ​universes ​
> can be lumped together.
> ​ 
>
>  John K Clark​
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to