On 27/11/2017 4:06 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 26 November 2017 at 13:33, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
You keep ignoring the obvious 800 pound gorilla in the room;
introducing Many Worlds creates hugely more complications than it
purports to do away with; multiple, indeed infinite observers with
the same memories and life histories for example. Give me a break. AG
What about a single, infinite world in which everything is duplicated
to an arbitrary level of detail, including the Earth and its
inhabitants, an infinite number of times? Is the bizarreness of this
idea an argument for a finite world, ending perhaps at the limit of
what we can see?
That conclusion for the Level I multiverse depends on a particular
assumption about the initial probability distribution. Can you justify
that assumption?
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
