On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:

​>> ​
>> I think think the string theory Multiverse is related to the inflation
>> theory Multiverse and both are related to the  Everett
>> ​/​
>> ​D​
>> eutsch Multiverse. When 3 different theories independently point in the
>> same direction nature may be trying to tell you something.
>
>
> ​> ​
> They don't point in the same direction.  The string theory and inflation
> theory multiverse posits different universes with different physical
> parameters due to random symmetry breaking.  Everett/Deutsch assume the
> same physics
>

​
All 3 assume the same physics.
​ ​
There must be some basic fundamental physical principles that remain the
same in every string universe and every
​ ​
Everett/Deutsch
​ ​
universe, although we don't know what they are, we don't know what's really
fundamental and what is not. 400 years ago Kepler tried to derive the fact
that there are 7 and only 7 planets from pure mathematics but he failed to
do so, he failed for 2 reasons, it turns out there are more than 7 planets
and he failed because the number of planets is not a fundamental law of
logic or physics but is a result of random happenstance. Some of the laws
of physics that we think of as fundamental may be like that, they are only
true in this universe. But there must be some laws of physics that are true
in every universe, I'd bet money that the second law of thermodynamics is
one of them
​,​
but there will be others.

And how is the Eternal Inflation Multiverse fundamentally different from
the String Theory Multiverse?
​

 J​ohn K Clark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to