On 3/8/2018 4:24 AM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 11:04:09 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 3/7/2018 5:39 AM, agrays...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote:
*Thanks for your time and effort, but I don't think you
understand my*
*question. Suppose a test particle is restrained spatially, say in *
*the Sun's gravitational field. When released, it starts to move
(toward *
*the Sun). How does GR explain this motion? By the advance of
time? AG*
Time was advancing all along. Your restraint was a force causing
the particle to follow a non-geodesic path through space-time.
When you released it, it then followed the "straightest path
possible", i.e. a geodesic.
Brent
So time is the "culprit". What has this resumption of spatial motion
(along a geodesic in spacetime) have to do with conservation of
momentum, if at all ? TIA, AG
It's not a "resumption" of motion; it's just tilting the direction of
motion from being along your coordinate time line (which you think of as
'not moving') to being along the geodesic (which you think of as
'falling'). The 4-momentum of the system, including whatever device you
were using to keep the particle from falling is conserved.
Didn't you say you had read Epstein?
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.