On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:
> *>* > *You don't need an instrument that can give a clean yes/no answer to the > presence of consciousness to develop scientific theories about > consciousness. We can start with the observation that all normal healthy > humans are conscious, and that rocks and other inert objects are not > conscious and work from there to develop a science of consciousness, based > on evidence from the observation of behaviour.* > But if it was all based on the observation of behavior then what you'd end up with is a scientific theory about intelligence not consciousness. John K Clark > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
