On 3/27/2018 10:19 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 at 1:50 am, Lawrence Crowell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 7:21:00 AM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:



        On 27 March 2018 at 09:35, Brent Meeker <[email protected]>
        wrote:



            On 3/26/2018 3:19 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:

            If you are not and never can be aware of it then in what
            sense is it consciousness?

            Depends on what you mean by "it".  I can be aware of my
            consciousness, without being aware that it is different
            than it was before; just as I can be aware of my
            consciousness without knowing whether it is the same as
            yours, or the same as some robot.


        If I am given a brain implant to try out for a few days and I
        notice no difference with the implant (everything feels
        exactly the same if I switch it in or out of circuit),
        everyone I know agrees there is no change in me, and every
        test I do with the implant switched in or out of circuit
        yields the same results, then I think there would be no good
        reason to hesitate in saying yes to the implant. If the change
        it brings about is neither objectively nor subjectively
        obvious, it isn't a change.


-- Stathis Papaioannou


    This argument ignores scaling. With any network you can replace or
    change nodes and connections on a small scale and the system
    remains largely unchanged. At a certain critical number of such
    changes the properties of the entire network system can rapidly
    change.


Yes, it is possible that this is the case. What this would mean is that that the observable behaviour of the system would stay unchanged as it is replaced from 0 to 100% and so would the consciousness for part of the way, but at a certain point, when a particular neurone is replaced, consciousness will suddenly flip on or off or change radically.

I think you are overstating that and creating a strawman. Consciousness under the influence of drugs for example can change radically, but not "suddenly flip" with one more molecule of alcohol.

Brent

And since neurones are themselves complex systems, within that neurone there will be a particular protein, or a particular atom in the protein which when replaced will lead to a flipping of consciousness, while all the time behaviour remains unchanged. It’s possible that in the last few minutes a cosmic ray has added a neutron to a crucial atom somewhere in your brain and this has radically changed your consciousness, but you don’t know it and neither does anyone else.

    I read the other day about this whole idea of brain uploading. The
    neurophysiologists are largely rejecting this idea.


Why?

--
Stathis Papaioannou
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to