On 3/27/2018 2:26 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 at 7:27 am, Brent Meeker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 3/27/2018 10:19 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:

    On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 at 1:50 am, Lawrence Crowell
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 7:21:00 AM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:



            On 27 March 2018 at 09:35, Brent Meeker
            <[email protected]> wrote:



                On 3/26/2018 3:19 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:

                If you are not and never can be aware of it then in
                what sense is it consciousness?

                Depends on what you mean by "it".  I can be aware of
                my consciousness, without being aware that it is
                different than it was before; just as I can be aware
                of my consciousness without knowing whether it is the
                same as yours, or the same as some robot.


            If I am given a brain implant to try out for a few days
            and I notice no difference with the implant (everything
            feels exactly the same if I switch it in or out of
            circuit), everyone I know agrees there is no change in
            me, and every test I do with the implant switched in or
            out of circuit yields the same results, then I think
            there would be no good reason to hesitate in saying yes
            to the implant. If the change it brings about is neither
            objectively nor subjectively obvious, it isn't a change.


-- Stathis Papaioannou


        This argument ignores scaling. With any network you can
        replace or change nodes and connections on a small scale and
        the system remains largely unchanged. At a certain critical
        number of such changes the properties of the entire network
        system can rapidly change.


    Yes, it is possible that this is the case. What this would mean
    is that that the observable behaviour of the system would stay
    unchanged as it is replaced from 0 to 100% and so would the
    consciousness for part of the way, but at a certain point, when a
    particular neurone is replaced, consciousness will suddenly flip
    on or off or change radically.

    I think you are overstating that and creating a strawman. 
    Consciousness under the influence of drugs for example can change
    radically, but not "suddenly flip" with one more molecule of alcohol.


If part of your consciousness changes as your brain is gradually replaced then you would notice but be aware noble to communicate it, which is what it scproblematic. One way out of this would be if your consciousness stayed the same up to a certain point then suddenly flipped. If you suddenly became a zombie you would not notice and not report that anything had changed, so no inconsistency. However, it’s a long stretch to say that consciousness will flip on changing a single molecule in order to save the idea that it is substrate specific.

But LC wasn't arguing it was substrate specific.  He was arguing that its scale specific.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to