On Saturday, June 16, 2018 at 9:46:32 PM UTC, John Clark wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 2:38 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote > > *> Delusion piled upon delusion. If you're so sure about the truth of the >> mathematics you rely on,* > > > I'm not sure of anything, I just think Many Worlds is the least crazy > explanation. If somebody ever has a better idea I'll abandon > M > any Worlds in a millisecond. > > > why do you refuse to answer my question about advanced waves? They're >> predicted by Maxwell's equations but are not in evidence in our >> observations. > > > I don't see why Many Worlds is required to explain advanced waves, > they're a key part in one of its rivals, John Cramer's Transactional > Interpretation. Cramer would say that advanced waves have been detected, he > think they are the cause of quantum weirdness because they allow the future > to effect the past. As I said if Many World's is not true something even > more absurd is, but at least the > Transactional Interpretation > is coherent, unlike Copenhagen. > > John K Clark >
*You seem to place great faith in mathematics. If so, since Maxwell's equations have advanced wave solutions, why do you prefer the MWI compared to the Transactional Interpretation? I see both as absurd. so I prefer to assume the wf is just epistemic, and/or that we have some holes in the CI which have yet to be resolved. AG * -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
