On 21-06-2018 05:01, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 6/20/2018 6:30 PM, smitra wrote:
On 19-06-2018 23:22, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 6/18/2018 6:03 PM, smitra wrote:
On 17-06-2018 22:42, Jason Resch wrote:
Hi Lawrence,
Is the evolution of states of the wave function computable? If so
then
the result of MRDP implies it is Diophantine.
Jason
Or you could try to see if QM could be a meta-theory that arises
when you try to give a statistical description of the set of all
these Diophantine sets. I tried to do something similar with the set
of algorithms a few years ago, getting a half-baked result, some
hints at how quantum field theory could arise from this.
You want to compute the probability that an observer that's encoded
by some mathematical structure has some given information content.
So, if you observe the outcome of an experiment, that's information
in your brain.
Which is the QBism interpretation of QM. If you take the view that
QM
is about predicting and explaining what one will see, there's no
point
in going further...the rest is metaphysics.
Brent
QM should then emerge as an effective theory and the correct
interpretation should also follow.
?? QBism is an interpretation.
Brent
If we derive QM from a more fundamental principle then that is likely to
single out one particular interpretation of QM as the correct one. So,
which interpretation is correct is then no longer a philosophical or
metaphysical question, it's something that can be probed experimentally
by testing the underlying theory from which QM is derived.
Saibal
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
