On 6/28/2018 8:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Also, if another sort of a multiverse exists besides the quantum multiverse, 
then in any physics experiment you're going to measure the totality of all the 
effects of all multiverses in which you have exact copies. The effects of these 
other multiverses e.g. as provided by inflation theory cannot necessarily be 
dismissed as trivial (e.g. by saying that it leads to uncertainty of the 
quantum state, the effects of which can be absorbed in a density matrix), as 
counting states with the restriction that the same observer is present per my 
argument in the previous posting, also leads to quantum-like laws.
Eventually, that can be related to the importance of not assuming any 
infinities. With arithmetic, we elude the non standard models of arithmetic, 
because the laws of addition and multiplication in such non standard model can 
be proved to be non computable. But with any theories which assumes some 
infinity, we can no more fight against the white rabbits. No Infinities is not 
an option, as I thought sometimes ago, but is made obligatory. Judson Webb 
insight was correct: Mechanism is a finitism.

How is that consistent with your idea of the UD producing infinitely many threads of computation through the same state?

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to