On 6/25/2018 8:06 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
I don't think that's the case. C seems to me to be capable to explaining
anything (e.g. we're living in the Matrix). The theories of M are certainly
incomplete, but if there is empirical data inconsistent with those theories
it just shows they have limited domain. If there is empirical data that is
impossible to include in M how would we know; how could we be sure that it
could not be included?
I don't see how that fact that I am conscious and have a first person
experience of reality could be explained by M.
I suggest you should think about what you accept as good explanations of
other phenomenon.
Brent
"A good answer is one that doesn't spoil the question."
-- P. T. Bridgeport (character in Walt Kelly's "Pogo")
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
