On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 4:27:03 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 20 Jul 2018, at 23:12, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 10:17:04 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 20 Jul 2018, at 04:40, [email protected] wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >> >> *Nevertheless, I still stand with Schroedinger that in any quantum >> superposition, other than for slit experiments, the system cannot be in all >> eigenstates simultaneously before measurement.* >> >> >> Then you can no more explain the working of an interferometer, or >> polariser, or even the structure of the hydrogen atoms, molecules, etc. You >> are just saying that QM works for the double slit, but not for anything >> else. That is contrary to the fact that QM has just never been shown wrong, >> at any scale and level. >> > > > > *Sorry, but I see you have no clue what I have been claiming in this > thread. Although I infer that English isn't your native language, you know > it well enough to understand my claim; yet you do NOT. How can you expect > to posit new theories about reality, such as based on arithmetic, if you > are unable to understand simple English? OK, let me start again. I am NOT > questioning the CALCULATED results of QM.* > > > > That is ambiguous. Is it SWE + COLLAPSE, or just SWE (+ Mechanism) ? >
*That you ask this question, shows you still have no clue what I am arguing about. Thanks for your time. AG * > > Personally by QM I mean the SWE or its Dirac Version, or DeWitt-Wheeler, > etc. Once I understood that Bohr’s perturbation act needs FTL influence, I > have ceased to judge the collapse plausible. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
