Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 à 20:30, <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:58:43 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 24 Jul 2018, at 09:19, [email protected] wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 4:27:03 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 20 Jul 2018, at 23:12, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 10:17:04 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 20 Jul 2018, at 04:40, [email protected] wrote: >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Nevertheless, I still stand with Schroedinger that in any quantum >>>> superposition, other than for slit experiments, the system cannot be in all >>>> eigenstates simultaneously before measurement.* >>>> >>>> >>>> Then you can no more explain the working of an interferometer, or >>>> polariser, or even the structure of the hydrogen atoms, molecules, etc. You >>>> are just saying that QM works for the double slit, but not for anything >>>> else. That is contrary to the fact that QM has just never been shown wrong, >>>> at any scale and level. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Sorry, but I see you have no clue what I have been claiming in this >>> thread. Although I infer that English isn't your native language, you know >>> it well enough to understand my claim; yet you do NOT. How can you expect >>> to posit new theories about reality, such as based on arithmetic, if you >>> are unable to understand simple English? OK, let me start again. I am NOT >>> questioning the CALCULATED results of QM.* >>> >>> >>> >>> That is ambiguous. Is it SWE + COLLAPSE, or just SWE (+ Mechanism) ? >>> >> >> >> *That you ask this question, shows you still have no clue what I am >> arguing about. Thanks for your time. AG * >> >> >> >> What are you arguing about? I’m afraid you are unclear in many of your >> replies, including to others. But you seem to believe that there is no >> superposition, >> > > *I never claimed that, never. You have no clue what I am arguing. NONE! AG* >
Could you use a bigger font and a redder color? Because it's too small for us to read... Also please stop taking time to explain yourself it is as we all know useless, instead I propose for you to directly insult people in blinking red 66pt sized font... It will be at last interesting. Thank you. > > > >> makes me doubt you have study QM, >> > > which is all about superposition. I do miss something, you might perhaps >> try to clarify. >> >> Bruno >> >> >> >>> Personally by QM I mean the SWE or its Dirac Version, or DeWitt-Wheeler, >>> etc. Once I understood that Bohr’s perturbation act needs FTL influence, I >>> have ceased to judge the collapse plausible. >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
