On Mon, Jul 23, 2018, 10:44 PM Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > > On 7/23/2018 8:40 PM, Jason Resch wrote: > > Other mathematics might work, but this seems to be the absolute > > simplest and with the least assumptions. It comes from pure > > mathematical truth concerning integers. You don't need set theory, or > > reals, or machines with infinite tapes. You just need a single > > equation, which needs math no more advanced than whats taught in > > elementary school. I can't imagine a TOE that could assume less. > > It might be interesting except that it executes all possible > algorithms. Another instance of proving too much. > > Now if you would find the diophantine equations that compute this world > and only this world that would be something. > Well for you to have a valid doubt regarding the everything predicted to exist by all computations, you would need to show why you expect each individual being within that everything should also be able to see everything. Jason > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
