> On 13 Aug 2018, at 19:59, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 8/13/2018 6:25 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> ...the measure on the set of branches are always 2^(aleph_0), and the >> measure is given by the square of the the amplitude of probability. > > ?? 2^(aleph_0) is never the square of the amplitude of probability.
Of course. It just means that the indeterminacy domain is a continuum, and that it needs Measure theory.The probabilities ate never given by a counting technic, but by measure of some area in some abstract (Hilbert-like) space. To be sure, I assume classical relativistic quantum mechanics, not some quantum GR theory where space-time itself might be quantised. Bruno > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
