On Sunday, October 28, 2018 at 1:34:09 PM UTC+1, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
> > *This definition of existence is self serving, and IMO theoretically and > philosophically extraneous. There is no reason to assume something exists > simply because it's consistent with anything, even the laws of physics. AG * > As I said, a consistently defined object is something rather than nothing, so it is there in some sense. Restricting this definition of existence would be arbitrary or anthropocentric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
