I appreciate Lawvere’s mathematics, but I am neutral on Hegel, and what he did is a part of the S4Grz1 logic, which concerns the subject, at the expense of the object. Some author makes good quality work, being rather clear, notably, but in doing so they help me to better understand why I do not follow them, or why their work cannot be applied in the frame of my basic hypotheses. In the case of Hegel and Leibniz, I appreciate their early work, in the case of Wittgenstein, I prefer his late work. Bruno > > - pt > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. > To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org > <mailto:email@example.com>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list > <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.