On Sunday, December 2, 2018 at 8:13:48 AM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote: > > > *Obviously, from a one-world perspective, only one history survives for a > single trial. But to even grossly approach anything describable as > "Darwinian", you have to identify characteristics of histories which > contribute positively or negatively wrt surviving but I don't see an > inkling of that. IMO, Quantum Darwinism is at best a vacuous restatement of > the measurement problemt; that we don't know why we get what we get. AG* > >> >> >>
In the *sum over histories* interpretation - of the double-slit experiment, for example - each history carries a unit complex number - like a gene - and this gene reenforces (positively) or interferes (negatively) with other history's genes in the sum. - pt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
