On 12/8/2018 2:46 PM, Jason Resch wrote:


On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 4:13 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 12/8/2018 11:02 AM, Jason Resch wrote:


    On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 4:04 AM Philip Thrift
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


        What is more primary than numbers?

        1. Numbers come from counting.


    Numbers come from relationships upon which objective statements
    can be made (with or without objects to count).
    For example, I can make and prove a statement about a number with
    a million digits.  Despite that there are not that many things
    (in my vicinity) to count.

    But only by abstracting from and generalizing some rules based
    counting and then postulating that they apply to arbitrarily large
    numbers of things.  For example, arithmetic assumes that you can
    add 1 to 10^1000 and get a different number.  But that is purely
    an assumption. Counting could never confirm it.


So then we agree that numbers don't inherit their existence or properties from from counting.

No, I agree that numbers do get their properties from counting by generalization, but not that they exist.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to