> On 12 Dec 2018, at 23:33, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 4:10 PM Jason Resch <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> > Tell me why an electron is a thing and 3 is not.
> 
> An electron can change in time and space, 3 can not change in either.
>  
> >>Computations "exist" in the universe of numbers in the same way that the 
> >>Incredible Hulk "exists" in the universe of Marvel comics. 
> 
> >And the "universe of numbers that describe the coordinates of mathematical 
> >objects called elections and photons" ? 
> 
> I don't understand the question.
>  
> > One of the few things we know for certain about consciousness is it 
> > involves change, but numbers never change in space or time; matter/energy 
> > is the only known thing that can change.
> 
> > Between any two casually separated universes, there is no means of 
> > comparing time, mass, size, etc. 
> 
> If it's separated there is no means of proving it even exists. But it's even 
> worse than that, logically the number 3 can not change, if it did it would 
> not be a 3. It reminds me of an old joke: 3+3=7, for extremely large values 
> of 3.
>  
> > That platonic computations seem static is only from your viewpoint.
> 
> But I thought our subjective viewpoint was what you were trying to figure out 
> and our viewpoint is certainly not static.
>  
> > For those beings whose minds are described by those computations, they 
> > would see a changing dynamic world around them.
> 
>  What would they see change?  It can't be numbers, in arithmetic  numbers are 
> replaced not changed, even after writing 3+3=6 the number 3 is still around 
> and doing just fine. If you know of something besides matter/energy that can 
> change I'd love to hear about it.


Very easy. The content of the relative memory of all observers implemented in 
arithmetic.

Bruno




> 
> >>I don't have proof but I have lots of examples of matter doing arithmetic 
> >>but nobody has an example of arithmetic doing matter. Matter/energy may or 
> >>may not be fundamental, but it's certainly more fundamental than 
> >>arithmetic. 
> 
> > This statement just shows you haven't read the papers.
> 
> I read them until it got too silly to read more, and that didn't take long.
> 
> >I am showing the inconsistency of the "Presentism" view, that what exists 
> >must constantly change in order for us to perceive change.
> 
> The past must leave some sort of record of itself for the present to know it 
> existed, and to make a record something must change and numbers don't change, 
> as far as we know only matter and energy have the ability to change in space 
> and time.
>  
> >>If it's not a change in experience with respect to time what is it with 
> >>respect to? The only alternative is a change in experience with respect to 
> >>space, but such a move would take time. 
> 
> > Change as we experience it is with respect to the self's indexical position 
> > and relation to previous and later states in some causal progression.
> 
> Without matter/energy and thus without change how are these indexical marker 
> positions of yours recorded? If I'm in the integer 8 in the Fibonacci 
> sequence there is no way I could know that I was in the Fibonacci sequence or 
> in a sequence of any sort unless I remembered that my previous state was a 5 
> and the one before that was a 3, but to form a memory something has to change 
> and 3, 5 and 8 never change.
>  
>  > Thus our brains perceive change despite being a part of what is 
> objectively a static object.  The you from 5 minutes ago is still perceiving 
> the point in time 5 minutes ago.
> 
> That requires a memory and that means something must have changed 5 minutes 
> ago that has persisted to now. And there is no way for pure numbers to do 
> that, but matter/energy can.
> 
> John K Clark
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Jason 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to