On Sunday, December 16, 2018 at 10:01:18 PM UTC, Bruce wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:56 AM Jason Resch <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 3:28 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected] >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> >>> >>> But a system that is consistent can also prove a statement that is false: >>> >>> axiom 1: Trump is a genius. >>> axiom 2: Trump is stable. >>> >>> theorem: Trump is a stable genius. >>> >> >> So how is this different from flawed physical theories? >> > > Physical theories do not claim to prove theorems - they are not systems of > axioms and theorems. Attempts to recast physics in this form have always > failed. > > Bruce >
QM can be interpreted as a system of axioms or postulates, and the HUP can be interpreted as a theorem, or consequence of those axioms or postulates. AG > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
