> On 1 May 2019, at 21:41, Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Map lookup is a valid implementation for any program you can conceive, albeit 
> a very ineffective one…

?

An implementation must be finite. For most programs, to implement them with a 
look up table would need an infinite look up table.

Bruno





> The chinese room is such implementation... And as much as my parts are not 
> me, i'm not the sum of my parts...
> 
> Quentin
> 
> Le mer. 1 mai 2019 à 20:34, Terren Suydam <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
> 
> I would argue for "pancyberpsychism" (I'm no good at naming - is there a name 
> for that already?) which is to say that there it is something it is like to 
> do information processing of any kind. However, the quality of the 
> consciousness involved in that processing is related to its dynamics. So 
> banging on a rock involves a primitive form of information processing, as 
> vibrations ripple through the rock - there it is something it is like for 
> that rock to be banged on. For ongoing consciousness, some sort of feedback 
> loop must be involved. A thermostat would be a primitive example of this, or 
> a simple oscillating electric circuit. The main idea is that consciousness is 
> associated with cybernetic organization and has nothing to do with substrate, 
> which might be material or virtual. 
> 
> In the Chinese Room example the cybernetic characteristics of the thought 
> experiment lack any true feedback mechanism. This is the case with most 
> instances of software as we know it - e.g. traditional chess engines. There 
> is something it is like to be them, but it's not anything we would recognize 
> in terms of ongoing subjective awareness. One could argue that operation 
> systems (including Mars Rovers) embody the cybernetic dynamics necessary for 
> ongoing experience, but I'd guess that what it's like to be an operating 
> system would be pretty alien. 
> 
> With biological brains, it's all about feedback and recursivity. Small 
> insects with rudimentary nervous systems are totally recursive, feeding 
> sensory data in and processing it continuously. So insect consciousness is 
> much closer to our own than ordinary Von-Neumann architecture data-processing.
> 
> As nervous systems get more complex, feeding in more data and processing data 
> in much more sophisticated ways, the consciousness involved would likewise be 
> experienced in a richer way.
> 
> Humans, with our intricate conceptual, language-based self-models, achieve 
> true self-consciousness. The self-model is a quantum leap forward, giving us 
> the ability to say "I am". The ego gets a bad rap but it's responsible for 
> our ability to notice ourselves and live within and create ongoing narratives 
> about what we are, in relation to what we aren't.  This explains why 
> ego-dissolving psychedelics lead to such profound changes in consciousness.
> 
> Terren
> 
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 3:02 PM Quentin Anciaux <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> 
> Le mer. 1 mai 2019 à 18:13, 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> a écrit :
> How is a computer conscious ? Magic ? Are you even aware of the Chinese Room 
> argument ?
> 
> Yes, and how is the chinese room not conscious ? Because you have to 
> associate it either to the dumb person acting as processor or the rules ? The 
> chinese room as a whole information processing unit is conscious. If you ask 
> it, it will tell you so... Prove it is not.
> 
> Quentin
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to