> On 6 May 2019, at 20:34, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 10:47 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> > On 3 May 2019, at 20:09, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List 
> > <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 5/3/2019 7:53 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> The current darkness comes from the separation of theology from science, 
> >> making exact science inexact and human science inhuman.
> >> 
> >> Religion is the only goal,
> > 
> > That's the kind of absolutist pronouncement that priests and despots have 
> > used to justify oppression and atrocities from auto-de-fe' to Buchenwald.
> 
> I could have put that truth, or meaning, or value, is the only goal, but, 
> normally, with what follow, i.e. “science is the only mean”, people should 
> understand that this assume the minimum spiritual maturity of those who knows 
> that in the religion domain, the argument-per-authority is not just not 
> valid, it is catastrophic.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> >> 
> >> Science is the only mean.
> > 
> > And every person is an end.
> 
> Absolutely.
> 
> Which should invite to be skeptic on all metaphysics which threat the 
> existence of persons.
> 
> Theology is today full of BS, not because theology is BS, only because 
> theology has been separated from science, with the goal to use it as a way to 
> control people. The prohibition of medication, and the idea that a government 
> can have a word on this, in place of you or your doctor, is the same 
> phenomenon. It is how liars get power, by appropriating the domain out of the 
> serious and modest inquirers. The USSR did that with genetics, because 
> theology was already just forbidden, and materialism (even the strong 
> version) was obligatory. It is always the use of the argument per authority, 
> in place of questions and other questions.
> 
> Bruno
> 
> 
> 
> I just found this quote by Godel, where he concluded mostly the same:
> 
> There would be no danger of an atomic war if advances in history, the science 
> of right and of state, philosophy, psychology, literature, art, etc. were as 
> great as in physics. But instead of such progress, one is struck by 
> significant regresses in many of the spiritual sciences. [123]
> 
>  http://kevincarmody.com/math/goedel.html 
> <http://kevincarmody.com/math/goedel.html>
> 
> Jason

The consequences of Mechanism assess many statement made by Gödel, including 
his skepticism toward naturalism. Unfortunately, like many, he taught that 
mechanism was a trick to defend materialism and naturalism, where, as I try to 
explain, mechanism and materialism are at the antipodes of each other.

Then Gödel was too much a mathematical realist. He was a set realist, on which 
I am rather neutral. With mechanism, finite set realism is assured, but the 
axiom of infinity is probably inconsistent at the ontological level. It would 
reintroduce too many “histories” and the white rabbits would come back (not 
that we can be sure they are eliminated with Mechanism, or even with the 
inferred quantum mechanics).

Gödel, like all those at the origin of Mathematical Logic (Boole, de Morgan, 
Peirce (the father)), was interested in theology, as illustrated by his 
formalisation of the Ontological Argument. Smullyan too. But, as Cohen 
explained, the theological motivation of mathematical logic has been forced to 
be hidden to permit the professionalisation of mathematics in the 18th century. 

All sciences are born from theology, which remind us that the belief in any 
reality out of personal consciousness requires an act of faith.

Each period of the human history where theology belonged to science have been 
enlightened, peaceful and prosperous. When theology is done with the scientific 
attitude, nobody agrees except on the necessity of research and dialogs. Once 
God is given a literal name, we get the lies, the war, the poverty. We get the 
feeling of superiority and inferiority, and the humans stop to recognise 
themselves in the others, leading to paranoïa and hysteria.

It is important, and unclear from the quite of Gödel, if he realised that when 
theology is back to science, we are just able to admit our ignorance, and 
become modest in the field. It is the claim of truth which is fatal in science 
and even more so in the fundamental science. Bringing back theology in science 
is equivalent to bringing back doubt, modesty, eventually even moral. The 
problem is that by separating theology from science, many get a wrong 
conception of science, like if it was truth by definition, when it is only 
doubt by definition. The idea that science = truth is not science, but 
scientism. 

Now, people want religion to be consolating, comforting, and based on wishful 
thinking. Maybe the humans are still a long way from this. Lies have their role 
too, both in arithmetic and in the human life. I am not still sure how to open 
the mind to people so that they can accept our ignorance. That requires some 
courage, I guess.

The danger (for harmonious life) is not ignorance, but the ignorance of 
ignorance. The attraction to complete knowledge, which simply cannot exist 
(assuming mechanism, or our local finiteness).

Bruno





> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/A9392514-B072-47E7-899B-7CD2F07F0C8F%40ulb.ac.be.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to