On Thursday, May 16, 2019 at 5:14:46 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 1:48 PM Philip Thrift <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> *> Information processing absent actual first-class entities of qualia (or 
>> experiences) can only produce zombies. One needs information processing 
>> operating in a material substrate where those entities are available to be 
>> combined and manipulated.*
>
>
> So something can behave intelligently but if it is lacking "f*irst-class 
> entities of qualia*" it can only be a intelligent zombie. But "*first-class 
> qualia*" sounds like  consciousness to me, so you're basically saying 
> only conscious things can be conscious. A tautology has the virtue of always 
> being true but it involves a unnecessary non-required pointless 
> repetition and reiteration of words where you end up at the exact same 
> place you started with. And that is typical of all consciousness theories.
>
> John K Clark
>
>
>
>
To be clearer: Qualia (the "ingredients" of consciousness) cannot be 
reduced to information processing. (That is what I mean by "first-class". 
If qualia could  be reduced to information processing, then they would 
derivative from information, or "second-class".)

But what is information processing? I just mean it in its generally and 
conventional definition as a subject:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_processing
cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information

Now can qualia be reduced to information? That is the question of central 
concern:

Information and the Origin of Qualia
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399078/

This article argues that qualia are a likely outcome of the processing of 
information in local cortical networks. It uses an information-based 
approach and makes a distinction between information structures (the 
physical embodiment of information in the brain, primarily patterns of 
action potentials), and information messages (the meaning of those 
structures to the brain, and the basis of qualia). It develops formal 
relationships between these two kinds of information, showing how 
information structures can represent messages, and how information messages 
can be identified from structures. The article applies this perspective to 
basic processing in cortical networks or ensembles, showing how networks 
can transform between the two kinds of information. The article argues that 
an input pattern of firing is identified by a network as an information 
message, and that the output pattern of firing generated is a 
representation of that message. If a network is encouraged to develop an 
attractor state through attention or other re-entrant processes, then the 
message identified each time physical information is cycled through the 
network becomes “representation of the previous message”. Using an example 
of olfactory perception, it is shown how this piggy-backing of messages on 
top of previous messages could lead to olfactory qualia. The message 
identified on each pass of information could evolve from inner identity, to 
inner form, to inner likeness or image. The outcome is an olfactory quale. 
It is shown that the same outcome could result from information cycled 
through a hierarchy of networks in a resonant state. The argument for 
qualia generation is applied to other sensory modalities, showing how, 
through a process of brain-wide constraint satisfaction, a particular state 
of consciousness could develop at any given moment. Evidence for some of 
the key predictions of the theory is presented, using ECoG data and studies 
of gamma oscillations and attractors, together with an outline of what 
further evidence is needed to provide support for the theory.


Now I would just way that the jury is out about qualia ⇨ information. If 
the above paper is right, then it's sort of settled, right? I still think 
the phenomenologists are right, that quaia is a different type of entity 
than information, or that that matter (in particular matter with 
consciousness/qualia) has both informationality and experientiality, that 
there is a calculus of experience that the brain is processing.


But it isn't settled.

@philipthrift


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f0fb96ac-3475-48a7-a537-14ae162fe4af%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to