> On 23 May 2019, at 10:35, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 3:03:01 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 
>> On 22 May 2019, at 07:35, Samiya Illias <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I have just read several messages on various threads in this list about God. 
>> I really don't know which one to answer to, nor do I wish to debate the 
>> subject. It is God to choose and guide whoever He wills; I can only keep my 
>> duty by sharing the ayaat of The Quran and the knowledge I learn therefrom.
> 
> 
> I agree with you that God is the ultimate one guiding us, but God is not 
> “God”, and nobody on Earth can use its name for any temporal spiritual 
> living. It brings automatically the argument per authority, which is 
> catastrophically, especially on he fundamental research.
> 
> 
> 
> Bruno
> 
> 
> 
> You don't agree with J.-P. Sartre that "Existence precedes essence." We are 
> born existentialists, not "guided" by any God.

I use God in the (Neo)platonician sense. God is the ultimate truth/reality that 
we search, with some insight that it is bigger than us.

Yet, with the digital mechanist hypothesis, the arithmetical truth is not 
distinguishable from God for the (finite) creature/machine/number, and a 
machine having stronger induction axioms can somehow study the theology of 
simpler machine, without necessarily lifting that theology on itself (which 
needs extra-caution, universal machine are confronted to a theological trap, 
and the wise machine remains silent on many “true” propositions).

That is the original sense of “god” by those who invented theology, from which 
they extracted physics and mathematics as competing theory about the 
fundamental reality (to simplify things a little bit).


> 
> Dissolving the "free will" question, G. Strawson just says "We have the 
> experience of freedom." That experience in and of itself is enough, 
> regardless of any God or physics or arithmetic.

Yes, free-will is the experience of freedom, and above all, its possible 
personal exploitation, as free-will concerns acts, not just the 
phenomenological sensation associated with it.

It happens when the machine leaves the cocoon of security (enumerable set of 
total computable functions, which always miss some total computable function) 
to insecurity or universality, where all total computable functions are 
available, but mixed in a highly non mechanical manner among the total 
computable.

Free-will require universality, not Löbianity (universality + knowledge of one 
own universality). Nut to know we have free will, this require Löbianity. 
Löbinanity arise from Universality + enough strong mathematical induction 
axiom, like believing that if P is true for 0, and if it is true that P(n) -> 
p(n+1) then it has to be true for all n.

For a platonist, God is what remain when you stop to believe in (ontological) 
physical universe. 

The traditional debate about God and Non-God is like an Aristotelian (weak 
materialist)  trick to make us forget that the original debate of the greek 
theologian was about the existence of the physical universe, seen as primary, 
that is origin of all the rest (consciousness included).



> 
> That experience we do know exists, except for the experience/consciousness 
> deniers.

We all agree in this list that consciousness exist, and that we do know our 
experience.

The problem is how to relate those experience with some reality that we are 
searching, or how to relate the experience and the observation, and what we can 
prove about this, and what is consistent with this or that theory, and how to 
test them.

Your approach is unclear if eventually you will not be the one denying 
consciousness to a large variety of persons or entities, due to the fact that 
they would not have the genuine metaphysical stuff to support their soul.

Bruno




> 
> 
> @philipthrift
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/cbc5376d-b4c4-49db-80e1-608e4482fac3%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/cbc5376d-b4c4-49db-80e1-608e4482fac3%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2C09F39F-9613-4809-ABC3-6FCE04B6689F%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to