> On 23-May-2019, at 10:20 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> You said that you did not want to debate. I read all your post, and reply
> long ago explains what I am not convinced, and why I think it departs from
> the sort of truth consistent with my working assumption.
Yes, you do respond to posts on this list. What I meant to write was that you
haven’t read my blogposts, since I do refer to The Bible in a number of my
blogposts. It is an article of faith to believe that just like The Quran, prior
scriptures have also been revealed by Allah for guidance.
>
> I think we have agreed on where we disagree, but I am open to discuss this
> further. But your post seems to reflect more Al Ghazali than Averroes (Ibn
> Rushd). If I am wrong on this, please correct me. To sum up the difference,
> the difference is in between submitting text to reason (and thus comparison),
> Avrroès, instead of submitting Reason to Text (Al Ghazali, which leads to
> literalism, which leads to conflicts).
I believe that the God who created me and granted me the ability to speak and
express my self is capable of expressing and communicating perfectly, and thus
the scriptures must be taken literally.
I’m delightfully pleased with the factual accuracy of The Quran and share my
learnings in over a hundred blogposts.
I have neither read Avrroes nor Al Ghazali. You can draw parallels if you wish.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/92503E6D-DAA2-45E9-8F94-27B1B559E52B%40gmail.com.
