On Saturday, June 15, 2019 at 4:06:27 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote: > > > > On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 14:16, Philip Thrift <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> >> Thus the rejection of panpsychism can be overcome by logical analysis, >> historical and cultural reflection, and perhaps even by chemical ingestion. >> >> >> https://highexistence.com/panpsychism-3-reasons-why-our-world-brimming-sentience/ >> >> via @PeterSjostedtH <https://twitter.com/PeterSjostedtH> >> >> >> Not quite my panpsychic materialism, but chemistry is involved! >> >> Panpsychiam is not consistent with functionalism, whereby if you change a >> part of the brain with a functional equivalent the subject notices no >> difference. This is because panpsychism is fundamentally substrate >> dependent. But there are good reasons for assuming that consciousness is >> substrate independent. >> >> -- > Stathis Papaioannou >
What are those? @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1126aec6-8413-4896-b1ca-cbe95d379f27%40googlegroups.com.
