On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 7:15:17 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/7/2019 6:25 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
> But the point is this topic was discussed for 20 years, beginning in the 
> group started by Victor Stenger (Timeless Reality). Physics does not rule 
> backward (or downward, for that matter) causation in or out, and someone 
> who tells you absolutely it is ruled out has no understanding of physics.
>
>
> In general it is ruled out by definition, as in classical mechanics: The 
> past and future are all determined by any sufficient set of conditions, so 
> when we give past conditions we say they cause the future condition and 
> when we give the future condition we say it is caused by the past.
>
> Brent
>
>


*Entangled Time*

https://www.sciencealert.com/if-you-thought-quantum-mechanics-was-weird-wait-til-you-check-out-entangled-time

*In both forward and backward directions, quantum correlations span the 
causal void between the death of one photon and the birth of the other.*

*We cannot afford to ignore spatial or temporal nonlocality in future 
metaphysics: whether or not the boots fit, we'll have to wear 'em.*

(What Would Vic (Victor Stenger) Say?)

@philipthrift

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6cbf8c2b-7e91-40c6-b88b-8cd613447e0a%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to