On Sunday, July 7, 2019 at 7:15:17 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > > > On 7/7/2019 6:25 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > But the point is this topic was discussed for 20 years, beginning in the > group started by Victor Stenger (Timeless Reality). Physics does not rule > backward (or downward, for that matter) causation in or out, and someone > who tells you absolutely it is ruled out has no understanding of physics. > > > In general it is ruled out by definition, as in classical mechanics: The > past and future are all determined by any sufficient set of conditions, so > when we give past conditions we say they cause the future condition and > when we give the future condition we say it is caused by the past. > > Brent > >
*Entangled Time* https://www.sciencealert.com/if-you-thought-quantum-mechanics-was-weird-wait-til-you-check-out-entangled-time *In both forward and backward directions, quantum correlations span the causal void between the death of one photon and the birth of the other.* *We cannot afford to ignore spatial or temporal nonlocality in future metaphysics: whether or not the boots fit, we'll have to wear 'em.* (What Would Vic (Victor Stenger) Say?) @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6cbf8c2b-7e91-40c6-b88b-8cd613447e0a%40googlegroups.com.
