On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:59 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 8/7/2019 2:37 PM, Jason Resch wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:23 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On 8/7/2019 8:30 AM, Jason Resch wrote: >> > This is made most clear in the case of a quantum computer. Where the >> > quantum computer can be viewed as one WORLD (def 1) that contains many >> > little worlds (def 2), where each computational trace constitutes its >> > own little world, causally isolated from the rest. >> >> Except those computational traces DO NOT constitute little worlds. They >> are not causally isolated. The whole function of the computer depends >> on them interacting, i.e. interfering coherently. >> >> > It depends on the algorithm. > > If, as in my neural net example, interference is not used, the many > computations are causally isolated, and will remain so (FAPP) once I read > the output bits. > > You seem to want it both ways. "Yes they are many worlds, but they're not > entirely or always completely causally isolated, so they're not really > separate worlds." > > > You're the one who introduced worlds and little worlds. My point is just > that doing computations with lots of qubits doesn't imply there are > separate worlds in which the computations happen; in fact it requires the > contrary if the computation is to come to a single conclusion. > No disagreement with that, but my point all along is that "many somethings" associated with the qubits in the quantum computer, can lead to many minds which can have many experiences, when the quantum computer executes computational traces which create conscious states. Do you disagree with this? Jason > Of course if you just measure some state and project it onto one of two > possible states, you can say, "Well there was another world were the > projection went the other way and so there must be another world for that > to happen in...which however is inaccessible from this world". But that's > back to Everett's argument and has nothing to do with the complexity of > calculation or the number of components of the computers state. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CA%2BBCJUh-GK5G5cn%3D%2BqvS-M5naBcARD15NMyv6hPvxX_RPBHTsQ%40mail.gmail.com.
