On 8/7/2019 8:47 PM, Jason Resch wrote:


On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:59 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 8/7/2019 2:37 PM, Jason Resch wrote:


    On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:23 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



        On 8/7/2019 8:30 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
        > This is made most clear in the case of a quantum computer. 
        Where the
        > quantum computer can be viewed as one WORLD (def 1) that
        contains many
        > little worlds (def 2), where each computational trace
        constitutes its
        > own little world, causally isolated from the rest.

        Except those computational traces DO NOT constitute little
        worlds. They
        are not causally isolated.  The whole function of the
        computer depends
        on them interacting, i.e. interfering coherently.


    It depends on the algorithm.

    If, as in my neural net example, interference is not used, the
    many computations are causally isolated, and will remain so
    (FAPP) once I read the output bits.

    You seem to want it both ways. "Yes they are many worlds, but
    they're not entirely or always completely causally isolated, so
    they're not really separate worlds."

    You're the one who introduced worlds and little worlds. My point
    is just that doing computations with lots of qubits doesn't imply
    there are separate worlds in which the computations happen; in
    fact it requires the contrary if the computation is to come to a
    single conclusion.


No disagreement with that, but my point all along is that "many somethings" associated with the qubits in the quantum computer, can lead to many minds which can have many experiences, when the quantum computer executes computational traces which create conscious states.  Do you disagree with this?

No.  As far as I know minds are classical like processes in brains. That's why you are never really "of two minds".  Superpositions corresponding to neurons firing and not-firing decohere far too quickly.  See Tegmark's paper.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/317322c0-b0b7-11ad-5273-19d0cd65d6d7%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to