On 8/7/2019 10:13 PM, smitra wrote:

No disagreement with that, but my point all along is that "many
somethings" associated with the qubits in the quantum computer, can
lead to many minds which can have many experiences, when the quantum
computer executes computational traces which create conscious states.
Do you disagree with this?
 No.  As far as I know minds are classical like processes in brains.
That's why you are never really "of two minds".  Superpositions
corresponding to neurons firing and not-firing decohere far too
quickly.  See Tegmark's paper.


Classical objects do not exist in this universe that works according to quantum mechanics. What happens is that due to decoherence macroscopic properties of objects behave as if they are described by classical mechanics, and Tegmark has shown that this is also true for brain processes. This only debunks the idea that a normal computer could never be conscious as e.g. Penrose has claimed. But because everything is still quantum mechanical, a brain observing the z-component of a spin that is polarized in the x-direction will still end up in an entangled superposition with the spin and the local environment. The brain consist of atoms and the many particle wavefunction of all the atoms in the brain and the environment will evolve according to the Schroedinger equation.

Saibal

True.  But there are two entanglements with the environment (including Wigner) which are orthogonal and cannot interact.  I realize this is statistical mechanics type phenomenon, i.e. it depends on there being many degrees of freedom.  But I think there must be a lower bound on non-zero probabilities, possibly imposed by cosmological considerations.  So the density matrix must become strictly diagonal in some basis.  This is the same as "some things happen and some don't".

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/81e530e1-137c-db7e-60f0-8e69cda81a68%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to