On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 11:41 AM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 8/8/2019 1:42 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> Do you not see that there is only one intermediate state and the > >> superposition is an artifact of expressing the state relative to a > >> certain basis? > > > > If it was an artfifact, one photon would not been able to interfere > > with itself, and there would be no Bell’s violation. > > It's an artifact of expressing the photon as a superposition of two > bases |left slit> and |right slit> which are not orthogonal. There is > still only one state, one wave function. > > Any multitude of things can also also be viewed as a single collection of that multitude. A multitude of classical computational traces can be found in a quantum computation. You point out this multitude of computation traces can be viewed as one state of a larger space. Viewing it this way, however, doesn't eliminate the multitude of the classical computational traces. Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CA%2BBCJUg176t%2BeAjhhVogjjWT1XD6ht%2BakFsxbYM430Y80iDmzQ%40mail.gmail.com.
