On Thursday, August 15, 2019 at 7:06:51 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:25 AM Lawrence Crowell <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I started reading this. It looks similar to the PR box argument. >> > > I have skimmed through it. It seems that Alice and Bob both split locally > according to the results they get, but then rely on magic to prevent the > incorrect pairs ever meeting. > > Not convincing. > > Bruce >
A black hole could do the trick. I have only looked at the first page of this, so I can't judge this deeply yet. I keep getting interrupted by things like phone calls and then my gallomph of a Labrador Retriever wanted attention. LC > > >> LC >> >> On Thursday, August 15, 2019 at 10:56:24 AM UTC-5, Jason wrote: >>> >>> From: https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/1/87/htm >>> >>> Abstract: We carry out a thought experiment in an imaginary world. Our >>> world is both local and realistic, yet it violates a Bell inequality more >>> than does quantum theory. This serves to debunk the myth that equates local >>> realism with local hidden variables in the simplest possible manner. Along >>> the way, we reinterpret the celebrated 1935 argument of Einstein, Podolsky >>> and Rosen, and come to the conclusion that they were right in their >>> questioning the completeness of the Copenhagen version of quantum theory, >>> provided one believes in a local-realistic universe. Throughout our >>> journey, we strive to explain our views from first principles, without >>> expecting mathematical sophistication nor specialized prior knowledge from >>> the reader. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7425e7f7-edb0-4074-8fbd-759eeb2a59a7%40googlegroups.com.
