On Thursday, August 15, 2019 at 7:06:51 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:25 AM Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>> I started reading this. It looks similar to the PR box argument.
> I have skimmed through it. It seems that Alice and Bob both split locally 
> according to the results they get, but then rely on magic to prevent the 
> incorrect pairs ever meeting.
> Not convincing.
> Bruce

A black hole could do the trick. I have only looked at the first page of 
this, so I can't judge this deeply yet. I keep getting interrupted by 
things like phone calls and then my gallomph of a Labrador Retriever wanted 


>> LC
>> On Thursday, August 15, 2019 at 10:56:24 AM UTC-5, Jason wrote:
>>> From: https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/1/87/htm
>>> Abstract: We carry out a thought experiment in an imaginary world. Our 
>>> world is both local and realistic, yet it violates a Bell inequality more 
>>> than does quantum theory. This serves to debunk the myth that equates local 
>>> realism with local hidden variables in the simplest possible manner. Along 
>>> the way, we reinterpret the celebrated 1935 argument of Einstein, Podolsky 
>>> and Rosen, and come to the conclusion that they were right in their 
>>> questioning the completeness of the Copenhagen version of quantum theory, 
>>> provided one believes in a local-realistic universe. Throughout our 
>>> journey, we strive to explain our views from first principles, without 
>>> expecting mathematical sophistication nor specialized prior knowledge from 
>>> the reader.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to