On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:23 PM Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 16 Aug 2019, at 03:27, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > [email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/15/2019 5:06 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:25 AM Lawrence Crowell < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I started reading this. It looks similar to the PR box argument. >> > > I have skimmed through it. It seems that Alice and Bob both split locally > according to the results they get, but then rely on magic to prevent the > incorrect pairs ever meeting. > > > I think you can interpret it as decoherence spreads at light speed from > Alice's measurement event and decoheres Bob's system when it comes within > the future light cone of Alice's measurement....and vice versa, which is > why it needs to assume MWI to maintain symmetry between Alice and Bob. > > > That is my understanding. That explains entirely, it seems to me, the > violation of Bell’s inequality in a local, but multi-versal type of > reality. When Alice and Bob separates, they simply never meet again, but > both can meet their correlated counterparts. Each Alice and each Bob can > meet only their correlates, that they enforce by decoherence, at a speed > lower than light. > That doesn't explain anything. Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLSbeRn8o8jWdGEybBNqy_HQeYjQJ2wmmosXx50u1si1QA%40mail.gmail.com.
