> On 16 Aug 2019, at 13:30, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:23 PM Bruno Marchal <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> On 16 Aug 2019, at 03:27, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> wrote:
>> On 8/15/2019 5:06 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:25 AM Lawrence Crowell 
>>> <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> I started reading this. It looks similar to the PR box argument.
>>> 
>>> I have skimmed through it. It seems that Alice and Bob both split locally 
>>> according to the results they get, but then rely on magic to prevent the 
>>> incorrect pairs ever meeting.
>> 
>> I think you can interpret it as decoherence spreads at light speed from 
>> Alice's measurement event and decoheres Bob's system when it comes within 
>> the future light cone of Alice's measurement....and vice versa, which is why 
>> it needs to assume MWI to maintain symmetry between Alice and Bob.
> 
> That is my understanding. That explains entirely, it seems to me, the 
> violation of Bell’s inequality in a local, but multi-versal type of reality. 
> When Alice and Bob separates, they simply never meet again, but both can meet 
> their correlated counterparts. Each Alice and each Bob can meet only their 
> correlates, that they enforce by decoherence, at a speed lower than light.
> 
> 
> That doesn't explain anything.

I know you’ve already try to expand on this, but it seems to me that this was 
based on some incorrect interpretation of the notion of worlds, like if a 
measurement made by Alice has to change the possible outcomes available to Bob, 
but that does not happen in the relative state view. Only a physical collapse 
would entail some “action at a distance”; without collapse anywhere, I don’t 
see how could such influence at a distance occurs. We did disagree also on the 
numbers of histories involved, which I take to be always infinite.

Bruno




> 
> Bruce 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLSbeRn8o8jWdGEybBNqy_HQeYjQJ2wmmosXx50u1si1QA%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLSbeRn8o8jWdGEybBNqy_HQeYjQJ2wmmosXx50u1si1QA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/429D1608-095F-4BC6-8BA8-05444AE4B70D%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to