On Thursday, August 15, 2019 at 8:27:23 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > > > On 8/15/2019 5:06 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:25 AM Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I started reading this. It looks similar to the PR box argument. >> > > I have skimmed through it. It seems that Alice and Bob both split locally > according to the results they get, but then rely on magic to prevent the > incorrect pairs ever meeting. > > > I think you can interpret it as decoherence spreads at light speed from > Alice's measurement event and decoheres Bob's system when it comes within > the future light cone of Alice's measurement....and vice versa, which is > why it needs to assume MWI to maintain symmetry between Alice and Bob. > > Brent > > >
All of this is well-established physics. @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/903070c8-ef06-44a7-9ad4-0071fef65372%40googlegroups.com.
