On Thursday, August 15, 2019 at 8:27:23 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > > > On 8/15/2019 5:06 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:25 AM Lawrence Crowell <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I started reading this. It looks similar to the PR box argument. >> > > I have skimmed through it. It seems that Alice and Bob both split locally > according to the results they get, but then rely on magic to prevent the > incorrect pairs ever meeting. > > > I think you can interpret it as decoherence spreads at light speed from > Alice's measurement event and decoheres Bob's system when it comes within > the future light cone of Alice's measurement....and vice versa, which is > why it needs to assume MWI to maintain symmetry between Alice and Bob. > > Brent > > >
All of this is well-established physics. @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/903070c8-ef06-44a7-9ad4-0071fef65372%40googlegroups.com.
