On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:25 PM Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:35 AM Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:32 PM Bruce Kellett <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:27 AM Jason Resch <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> These videos provide a good introduction:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5rAGfjPSWE
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fG52mXN-uWI
>>>>
>>>> Virtual particles are the basis of all particle interactions in QED,
>>>> called the jewel of physics for having made the most accurate predictions
>>>> of any physical theory.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The trouble is that virtual particles are internal lines in Feynman
>>> diagrams, and the Feynman diagrams are formed as a perturbation expansion.
>>> They have to be summed to make contact with physical processes. This puts
>>> the status of virtual particles, as ontological entities, into considerable
>>> doubt. Ultimately, they are nothing but a calculational device, and quantum
>>> amplitudes can be evaluated without ever using Feynman diagrams, so virtual
>>> particles need never appear anywhere.
>>>
>>>
>> But this "calculational device" (funny how many things are mere devices)
>> predicts the lamb shift as well as the Casimir effect, to great accuracy.
>>
>
> No, virtual particles do not predict the Lamb shift -- they are just an
> aid to calculating terms in the perturbation expansion of the QED vertex
> function.
>
>
Is this answer in error?
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/443186/lamb-shift-and-virtual-particles


Aren't virtual particles necessary for explaining the limited range of the
strong force?  And solving the blackhole information paradox?

Jason

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CA%2BBCJUhm9Y43-SK-gBPu3FEFKKpB%3DQSVH8iZGKfiha0uTJJnfg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to