On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 10:45:12 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/27/2019 11:34 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 12:21:12 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote: 
>>
>>
>> Maybe Neumaier is a good enough physicist not to let his theological 
>> beliefs influence his physics. Don Page is another such whose name springs 
>> to mind. Neumaier's rejection of the reality of virtual particles and 
>> quantum foam is soundly based on his good physics.
>>
>
>
>
>
> https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/interview-mathematician-physicist-arnold-neumaier/
>
> He seems more of a dabbler in physics to me. He is primarily a 
> mathematician.
>
> The problems that these additional elements in the traditional 
> interpretations are supposed to solve are sidestepped in the thermal 
> approach by realizing basic but previously overlooked facts: The first is 
> that we never ever measure directly something microscopic. Instead we 
> deduce the microscopic information indirectly from macroscopic measurements 
> together with some theory relating it to the microscopic system of 
> interest. The second fact is that a macroscopic observation is simply the 
> deterministic reading of an ensemble expectation value, and not (as 
> postulated in the conventional interpretations) an intrinsically random 
> event governed by Born’s probabilistic rule. Both facts together eliminate 
> the validity of all no-go theorems for a realistic interpretation of 
> quantum mechanics.
>
>
> There's nothing new about an ensemble interpretation, but it is 
> effectively a hidden variable theory and so is non-local.  That's why it's 
> not popular.
>
> Brent
>
>
>
I any case, reading about his

    * thermal interpretation of quantum physics (including quantum 
mechanics, quantum field theory, quantum statistical mechanics**, and 
application)*

     https://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/physfaq/therm/

(and there are comments in some forums on this interpretation) seems "out 
there", and his home page

   God excels in loving those He wants to love.
   He excels in forming those He wants to form.
   He excels in trying those He wants to try.
   He excels in testing those He wants to test.
   
   God excels in destroying what He wants to destroy.
   He excels in creating what He wants to create.
   
   God is perfect in everything. 
   <https://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/sciandf/eng/perfect.html>
   All powers are His,
   From the dawn of history into all eternity.
   
   This is why it is safe to be in His arms,
   Like a small child loved by his mother.
   
   As all those who want to follow His lead,
   He loves me <https://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/sciandf/eng/joy.html>, 
   and I love Him <https://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/sciandf/eng/arms.html>
   .
   
           https://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/



leads one to come to the crackpot diagnosis.

He seems to do some good mathematics and numerical analysis, bit outside of 
that ...

@philipthrift


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6c534ece-e600-4fb4-ae88-27d8eea7ce96%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to