On Sunday, September 8, 2019 at 1:40:36 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 10:10 AM Lawrence Crowell <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > > I think the Born rule should likely be proven, proven to be false, or >> shown to be unprovable, outside the context of any interpretation. > > > How could the Born rule be proven to be false, isn't the experimental > evidence in its favor as strong or stronger than just about anything in > science? > > John K Clark >
I doubt it is false, though Don Page thinks it is. It could be that the utility of the Born rule is some sort of formal "accident." LC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1971bd7b-da32-4182-b688-59fad43ea44b%40googlegroups.com.
