On Sunday, September 8, 2019 at 5:40:55 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > > On 7 Sep 2019, at 07:14, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 9/6/2019 9:51 PM, Philip Thrift wrote: > >> > >> I would put "Horganism" another way. > >> > >> Science tells stories/theories, and some are successful in their > application. But we don't know if any of the stories are the final ones to > be told, or even close to being final. (They probably are not.) There is no > settled story of gravity yet, much less consciousness. One reads about a > new story of gravity in science news every week, it seems. > >> > >> David Chalmers' conclusion is ... > >> > >> "I think that the Hegelian [dialectical] argument gives good reason to > take both panpsychism and panprotopsychism very seriously. If we can find a > reasonable solution to the combination problem for either, this view would > immediately become the most promising solution to the mind–body problem. So > the combination problem deserves serious and sustained attention." > >> - http://consc.net/papers/panpsychism.pdf > > > > Zero predictive power and it's not clear that it's consistent with the > rest of neurophysics. > > + zero explanation power at all, also. > > Bruno > > > > > > But panpsychism more explanatory than consciousness from numbers.
@philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f8eb9f6d-64b7-4b3e-b6cc-2f93eba42d77%40googlegroups.com.
