On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:57 AM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On 9/19/2019 4:05 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> On 16 Sep 2019, at 22:18, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/16/2019 5:39 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >>> As I said I my other post, it is just Descartes’ idea that our body
> obeys laws which are locally computable, made precise by using Turing
> mathematical definition of computability. It is the hypothesis that there
> no magic happening in the brain, somehow. Or that the brain is Digitally
> emulable *at some description level* relevant for staying alive and well.
> >> But then you conclude that physical objects, like brains, are not
> Turing computable...and thus arrive at contradiction to your starting
> hypothesis.
> > No. As the reasoning show only that the particular matter used in the
> digital substitution does not matter, which we knew at the start.
> >
> > To get a contradiction you need to show that the matter that we observed
> is differ,t from the matter brought bay the infinitely many computations
> statistically interfering below our substitution level, but we do find
> there exactly what nature shows us there.
>
> It's hard to parse what that means.  But I think it says that we have to
> infer the structure of matter entailed by the UD using some statistics
> (not clear which) and compare this to the matter we observed (where?  in
> the brain? in the digital substitute?).  This reminds me of string
> theory. It's so complicated we can't figure out what it implies, but
> we're sure that if we did there would be no contradiction with observation.
>

No, that's not quite right Brent. What he means is that is he does the
statistics right, he will get agreement with the physics in some world or
another -- not exactly clear which.

Bruce

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLS8n8q5a7mXMaNxDJ3ZJu%3DP0ZKrnTbYd19AyA6AMF8caQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to