On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 8:42 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>You agree with me that you have survived for another day if there is > something today that remembers being Bruno Marchal yesterday, and that's > fine but then you immediately contradict yourself by talking about *THE* first > person even if there is a machine that can produce many things that have > that property. And your pitiful attempt to cover up this enormous > discrepancy by introducing the idea of *THE* first person from *THE* first > person are laughable. > > > > *Not, it is quasi tautological with the definition given of the first > person. And even kids understand that both fist person will understand what > was meant by the use of the term* > You may be able to convince kids that you are not talking gibberish but I am not a kid and you haven't convinced me and you haven't convinced even one of the 2,382 members of the National Academy of Sciences. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2o5AjOQw7TWgXAWs96rttKh-vgz7%2BWVBjrsB0dEtpusA%40mail.gmail.com.
