> On 29 Sep 2019, at 21:47, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 8:42 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >>You agree with me that you have survived for another day if there is > >>something today that remembers being Bruno Marchal yesterday, and that's > >>fine but then you immediately contradict yourself by talking about THE > >>first person even if there is a machine that can produce many things that > >>have that property. And your pitiful attempt to cover up this enormous > >>discrepancy by introducing the idea of THE first person from THE first > >>person are laughable. > > > > Not, it is quasi tautological with the definition given of the first > > person. And even kids understand that both fist person will understand what > > was meant by the use of the term > > You may be able to convince kids that you are not talking gibberish but I am > not a kid and you haven't convinced me and you haven't convinced even one of > the 2,382 members of the National Academy of Sciences.
I have not met a scientist who studied my work who has not understood it. I am the guy who just remind the scientist that, “even assuming an apparent simplifying hypothesis like Digital Mechanism”, the problem is not simple, but is reducible to the problem of justifying physics from arithmetic, like the platonician tried for a millenium, and give rise to the physical sciences and the mathematical science (and they were at the start conceive as different way to conceive the fundamental reality). Now, when you see the time needed to make people aware that all papers justifying the danger of cannabis,and this despite the lies were gross fraud, and last only since 80 years, you can imagine the time it will be needed to make people accept that the separation of theology from science was also a lie, even a blasphemy, whose only use is to create the famous “opium for the people” so that a tyran & Co can steal the money and control the people. Your own attitude illustrates this. You negate a key simple point at the bringing of the argument, but each time you provide an explanation, you change the words, you distract with different topics, you say what I say with the tone I would have disagreed, … well only semantical trick with a dismissive tone, which just hides the fact that you don’t have any argument. And then you “refute” the step seven, by just showing you have never read anything in the domain, as here you refute what all mathematical logicians know since the 1930s. At least you dare to answer and discuss, or fake to discuss, as my academical opponents in Brussels have stop the thesis at the recevability level, so that I have never meet them. They have stopped the thesis despite their own expert in each disciplinary fields that I use (mainly mathematical logic and quantum physics) have not found any error. Only a philosopher said that he is not convinced, when personal conviction are not allowed in science. And here is the “originality, I show that we can do theology with the scientific method. I provide a way to refute mechanism, and show that up to now, on the contrary, nature confirms the physics made necessary when we assume Digital Mechanism, that is the “many-histories” internal interpretation of arithmetic (internal means developed by almost all universal machine in arithmetic. Now, if you know a members of the national Academy of Sciences who would have found an error in my thesis, different from the minor (and less minor) that I found myself since, just invite him to publish a paper, or to let it known. Without you doing this, you are just invoking an arguent of authority, which is … not valid. So try again. Bruno > > John K Clark > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2o5AjOQw7TWgXAWs96rttKh-vgz7%2BWVBjrsB0dEtpusA%40mail.gmail.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2o5AjOQw7TWgXAWs96rttKh-vgz7%2BWVBjrsB0dEtpusA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/582809F8-239E-497D-B246-7AF779E2F16C%40ulb.ac.be.
