On 10/26/2019 10:48 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 11:42:21 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
On 10/26/2019 10:31 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
> QM does suggest a particle can be in several paths
simultaneously, but
> we don't have a concept to understand how that can be. AG
Who says we don't have that concept? We have the mathematics to
describe and predict it. What more do you want...something that
would
convince Aristotle or your great-grandmother? Nature doesn't need to
adjust to your intuition; it's the other way around.
Brent
That's the "shut up and calculate" philosophy. So was Feynman wrong
when he said no one understands QM? AG
You still haven't said what you mean by "understand". What is it over
and above being able to correctly apply the mathematics and get the
right answer. What is it you think Zurek or Carroll or Lawrence or
Schlosshauer don't understand?
Brent
I have given you a proof. I'm not obliged to give you an understanding.
--- Oliver Heaviside
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7a49b3bd-9c51-914e-6947-7348258ae5fe%40verizon.net.
